[Notes] (Ir)Reproducible Machine Learning: A Case Study
Photo Credit I just read this (draft) paper named “(Ir)Reproducible Machine Learning: A Case Study” (blog post; paper). It reviewed 15 papers that were focusing on predicting civil war and evaluated using a train-test split. Out of these 15 papers: 12 shared the complete code and data for their results. 4 have errors. 9 do not have hypothesis testing or uncertainty quantification (including 3 of 4 papers with errors). Three of the papers with errors shared the same dataset. Muchlinski et al.[1] created the dataset, and then Colaresi and Zuhaib Mahmood[2] and Wang[3] reused the dataset without noticing the critical error in Muchlinski et al.’s dataset construction process — data leakage due to imputing the training and test data together. ...